Medicare for All or Medicare for Everyone Who Wants It

August 15, 2019

By Jill Zorn |

Note: This is Part 2 of our Medicare For All Series. Check out Part 1 here.

There is actually a lot of consensus around the values and goals of Medicare for All.

Looking at the health reform bills introduced in Congress and the policy approaches being debated by Democratic candidates vying for the presidency, there is clear support for universal access to quality, affordable health care.  There is agreement that the current system is broken and that government should play a stronger role in expanding and improving coverage.

But there is plenty of disagreement, too.

The range of bills Democrats have introduced in Congress can generally be categorized as follows:

Today’s blog covers the policy similarities and differences of the first two, Improved Medicare for All and Improved Medicare for Everyone Who Wants It.

Overview and History

There are two very similar Medicare for All bills, one in the House and one in the Senate. And there is one Medicare for Everyone Who Wants It bill: the Medicare for America Act introduced in the House by Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro.

Title and Bill Number Chief Sponsor Cosponsors
Medicare for All Act of 2019

S 1129

Sen. Bernie Sanders 14 cosponsors, including

Sen. Richard Blumenthal

Medicare for All Act of 2019

HR 1384

Rep. Pramila Jayapal 117 cosponsors, 1 from CT:  Rep. Jahana Hayes
Medicare for America Act of 2019

HR 2452

Rep. Rosa DeLauro 23 Cosponsors


Both Medicare for All proposals are single-payer bills (see our previous blog, What Do We Mean When We Say “Single Payer” to read more about this term) where the health care for all Americans would be administered and paid for through one federal government program.

The original Medicare for All bill, HR 676, was sponsored in the House in 2003 by Rep. John Conyers.  The bill underwent a major rewrite and was re-introduced in 2019 with a new bill number and a new sponsor – Rep. Jayapal.  A Senate bill did not emerge until 2017, when it was introduced by Bernie Sanders. The 2019 version of the Senate bill also underwent some revision.

Medicare for America was first introduced in December 2018, and then re-introduced in 2019.  This proposal makes Medicare available to everyone, while allowing employers to still offer private coverage if they wish.  Essentially the bill assumes that over time the employer market will disappear or certainly shrink in size, but it does not force it to disappear within the shorter time frames (two-to-four-years) in the Medicare for All bills. Medicare for America draws many of its ideas from policy proposals written by:


All three bills guarantee coverage for all US residents and disrupt the current system in major ways.   Similarities include:


The chart below highlights several of the key differences.  One major area of difference is about whether employer-sponsored and Medicare Advantage insurance survives.   How the plans are financed, and how big of an impact they have on the federal budget also differs.  The Medicare for All plans have provided less detail about financing.  But they are very clear that premiums and out-of-pocket payments will generally not be part of financing – that all financing will be via taxes.  Medicare for America relies on a combination of premiums, copayments and employer and individual taxation, while protecting lower income people from these payments and taxes.


  Medicare for All Medicare for America  
Employers’ role in coverage Eliminates all employer-sponsored insurance Employers choose whether to offer or retain private insurance coverage or pay 8% of payroll into the Medicare Trust Fund.  Employees can opt into Medicare or keep their employer coverage, if it is offered
Transition period Senate plan:  four years

House plan:  two years

Two years for individuals.  Up to six years for large employers to decide whether to offer coverage or pay toward their employees’ Medicare coverage
Role of private insurance Basically none Medicare Advantage plans are allowed, with strict regulation and payment limits and enhanced consumer protections
Premiums None, but individuals pay into the program via taxes No premiums below 200% FPL.  Sliding scale tied to income and limited for those above 600% of FPL to full premium or 8% of income, whichever is lower
Out-of-pocket cost sharing None, except Senate plan proposes cost-sharing for prescription drugs capped at $200/year No deductibles. 20% cost sharing based on income on a sliding scale; max of $3,500 per individual and $5,000 for family
Financing Unspecified taxes.  The senate plan has a separate white paper that lays out possible options.  Both plans set a global budget for federal health care expenditures. A combination of premiums, cost-sharing, employer payroll taxes, repealing the 2017 tax cut and specific taxes generally paid by wealthier individuals.


To Learn More: 

What is in the bills – Medicare for All

What is in the bills – Medicare for America (Medicare for Everyone Who Wants It)

Articles and charts comparing bills



Article tags: ,